Hello. For those new to this blog here are the basics. I will keep updating this post in the future as I deem appropriate.

**The Basics
**

All articles use Wins Produced and WP48 [Wins Produced per 48 minutes] to evaluate player’s performance.* This measure uses three key components to evaluate a player:

- The player’s per minute box score statistics
- The player’s team’s per minute box score statistics
- The average performance at the player’s position (PG, SG, SF, PF or C)

A full explanation can be found here. To give a general scale, an average player has a WP48 score of 0.100. The very best players in the league usually have a WP48 over 0.300. To put this in perspective; an average player who plays a full season at 40 minutes a game would generate around 6.83 wins for their team. In contrast, a player posting a 0.300 WP48 would generate about 20.5 wins at 40 minutes a game over an 82 game season.

I typically consider 400 minutes in a season a significant sample

I consider:

- a <.000 WP48 player a waste of a roster spot
- a .050 WP48 player a bench player
- a .100 WP48 player a starter
- a .200 WP48 player a star
- a .300 WP48 player a superstar

I may also talk about the half-baked notion and Wins over replacement Player (WORP).

**The Stats**

Stats used

- All basic NBA stats, including play time and salary are from Basketball-Reference
- The Player Efficiency Rating (PER) metric is the work of John Hollinger. The exact numbers are taken from Basketball-Reference. (
*****Warning***:**Read this before attempting use - The Win Shares (WS and WS48) metric is based on the work of Dean Oliver and Bill James. It is implemented by the fine folks at Basketball-Reference.
- The Wins Produced (WP and WP48) metric is the work of Berri and Schmidt. I use the Automated Wins Produced site (thanks Andres!!!) which is powered by data from Basketball-Reference and Yahoo Sports.

**The Rules**

- As long as you’re polite and don’t swear (excesively :-)). I will let you comment.
- I will make snarky and innapropiate comments. If you laugh great. If not, deal with it.
- Keep in mind that I will be wrong many many times in this space. I will also be right (hopefully at a higher frequency).
- Here’s a handy dandy template for Comments:

** **

** **What does it all mean?** **

** **

** **

51. You overvalue rebounding.

52. You undervalue players who create their own shot.

53. You must not watch the games.

54. You ignore defense.

55. The box score doesn’t track the right stats.

56. Anyone who says Player X is better than Player Y must be wrong.

57. Your results don’t pass my laugh test.

58. You are obviously wrong for reasons I won’t share.

59. Wins Produced has been proven wrong in papers that aren’t peer reviewed.

60. You just hate Player X.

61. You aren’t/can’t measure heart/chemistry/intangibles/’the it factor’

Arturo,

I am a student writing a paper analyzing NBA free agent movement and hoped you could give me some ideas as to how to find the data I need. I can’t find an email address for you, but please email me at the address I used to post. Thanks.

I sent you a note with the info. Good luck.

[…] wilds of the net has inspired a response. The gist of the comment was that the Wins Produced model (see here for detail) was as accurate as just using games won last season. Rather than give the typical internet […]

[…] been working on a model to predict success in the NBA using the Wins Produced metric (See the Basics here). In a sense, it’s the mission statement of this blog. The intent is to shake out the […]

[…] based on reader feedback. I then revised it again based on some more reader comments (go here for the Basics). The equation now reads as […]

[…] (Note: If you’re new here, the numbers used for the ranking and the rest of this post are explained here). […]

[…] (Note: If you’re new here, the numbers used for the ranking and the rest of this post are explained here). […]

[…] let’s take a look at who the Heat were and how they got here. (Before we do that go here for the basics behind all the models and maths if you’re new at this sort of thing) This has all happened […]

[…] let’s take a look at who the Heat were and how they got here. (Before we do that go here for the basics behind all the models and maths if you’re new at this sort of thing) This has all happened […]

[…] But before we begin you may need to read this […]

[…] or very thouroghly in Stumbling on Wins just buy the book). I’ve covered this before (see The Basics , and here ). In the book (which I recommend you buy ), the finding is that there is diminishing […]

[…] the math in this post, as always, consult the Basics . Let’s start then with the WP48 for every one of Shaq’s […]

[…] moment, the light to something transferable to other people. At this point, I take understanding of the Basics for granted and I really shouldn’t. One of the reasons I started this blog was to take a lot […]

[…] in this space for many of the reader questions (and for my own useI’m pretty sure I hit the Basics more than basically anyone for reference) .For this one, I’m taking on one of the big ones : […]

[…] Wins originally on August 3rd. It was inspired by my tweaking around with Automated wins produced (go see the Basics) and realizing that Hey! The Knicks might be good. This piece then took about two weeks to […]

[…] quick background. Start at the Basics. For this post I’m judging player importance by their net impact in terms of Wins Produced […]

[…] is such a story. First go read the Basics for […]

[…] Wins Produced divides defense up at the team level for all stats that are not in the boxscore (see the Basics for detail). So I have been trying for a while to get at this. And it’s been hard but […]

[…] makes me go out and break out some maths and some datasets. So feel free to grab a drink, review the Basics or the Basics walkthru even, because this post? It goes to […]

[…] known how to accrue value. It’s point margin and it’s super correlated to wins (see the Basics or here for my work on point margin). The key finding with Wins Produced is how to assign that […]

[…] did a few days ago. In it I debuted my version 2 of opponent adjusted Wins Produced Model (see the Basics for details). The idea was to take into account not just what a player does in terms of point […]

[…] piece on the meaning of average? that’s going on the next revision of the Basics (coming […]

[…] that my rankings (done with great care with a perfect blend of maths, excel, a heavy dose of the Basics and powered by NerdNumbers) looked very much like the numbers coughed up by the supercomputers up […]

[…] a day to day visualization of Wins Produced by team for the season as of 01/29/2011 (see here for explanations if you’re new). Wanna know how your team’s doing lately? Take a […]

[…] the Basics:All articles use Wins Produced and WP48 [Wins Produced per 48 minutes] to evaluate player’s […]

[…] table shows all the most commonly used models of player performance in the NBA (See here for full on explanations) and it shows two key […]

[…] doesn’t say about players. If you’re interested in more info, there are several great resources […]

[…] short answer is No, it’s not the best quintet of Wins Produced All NBA […]

[…] or very thouroghly in Stumbling on Wins just buy the book). I’ve covered this before (see The Basics , and here ). In the book (which I recommend you buy ), the finding is that there is diminishing […]

[…] let’s take a look at who the Heat were and how they got here. (Before we do that go here for the basics behind all the models and maths if you’re new at this sort of […]